Since then, the debate team has grown to include several regularly attending members, all of whom are extremely excited that our school now has a debate team. Junior Conor Holland said “I really enjoy the opportunity to discuss and argue about current events.”
Since the beginning of January, the Debate team has been meeting every Thursday at 3:05 pm, to practice debating against each other. However, the students won’t be able to compete against other schools until next year because the 2009-2010 formal debate season is coming to an end.
The fact that the formal season is ending has not set the team back, however; the group is using this extra time to prepare for debating against other schools next year. “We would have been destroyed if we had gone right into debating other schools,” Mrs. Johnson said: “We’ve been using this time to practice debating against each other, so that we’ll be ready to debate other schools next season.”
The team is using the Lincoln-Douglas form of debate; this is a formal, 1 versus 1, value-based style that begins with both debaters presenting constructive arguments. Each debater also receives the opportunity to conduct a cross-examination: each fires questions at his opponent, with the intention of exposing flaws in his argument—before both debaters provide their rebuttal speeches.
The current topic that all high school debate teams have been examining, for the months of March and April, is “In the United States, the principle of jury nullification is a just check on government.” The students must argue affirmatively, thus agreeing with the statement—or negatively, thus opposing the statement. The National Forensics League chooses the topics that schools debate: this organization sets the standards for high school debating. Currently, the students are researching the topic and debating each other.
For the topic of jury nullification, the team members engaged in their first debate against each other on Wednesday, March 17th. For this debate, Joe Combs argued for the affirmative and Conor Holland argued for the negative side.
Mrs. Johnson said “I strongly encourage anyone interested in debating to come on Thursday afternoons to experience it for yourself.” The team is still open to new members, and there’s no shortage of reason to join. Competitive debating is a great opportunity to become a more logical and analytical thinker. Involvement with a debate team also assists tremendously with becoming a spontaneous and confident speaker: all of which is highly desirable to college admission officers.
Although the debate team is off to a strong start, Mrs. Johnson and Mr. McIntosh would enthusiastically welcome additional members interested in developing their analytical skills. “This has been an extremely good experience for me” Joe said; and with strong preparation and practice, by next year, Worthington Christian High School ’s debate team could stand out among the other great debate teams of central Ohio .